Children are dieing and being hospitalized. Some parents are either uneducated or plain stupid. Should the government really be able to control our lives that much? There is no guarantee against future human error. Parenting offers an array of topics worth evaluating, making this broad subject ideal for an Parenting license argumentative essay.
Unless we begin to control our populations, we could be doomed. Pro parenting classes When it comes to the topic of requiring moms and dads to take parenting classes and earn a license, most mamas are on board. Nevertheless, we do permit irresponsible parenthood and creation of life through natural means.
I think it would also save Parenting license argumentative great deal of marital drama, and help parents align in their values and create more of a united front," explains Leahy.
Children would be in financially stable homes, and get whatever necessities the child needs. Evaluate whether incentivizing behavior causes a child to always expect a reward, which may lead to low self-esteem when the reward is not provided. Licensing Exams need to include questions that ferret out the Parenting license argumentative nuts who will grievously harm their offspring if old fangled dictums are disobeyed.
Since most clergy require classes before people marry, maybe this is the time to insert some parenting classes. As a mother I would feel very uncomfortable and indignant even if anyone questioned my right and ability to be a parent. Men and women who are convicted a second time would be forced into sterilization.
You have to be allowed to stumble and fall. What would the punishment be? I also understand that people may have test anxiety, but there would be multiple tests that you could pass, no matter what kind of test taker you are.
There will be people who will always be poor parents regardless of how much guidance you give them. That is how things should be: Often we all do as our mother for better or worst.
The debate on how to regulate human cloning is what got Tittle thinking that maybe rules should be applied to all parents. That may sound cruel but it is the truth. But then that gets into a whole mess of what the licensing requirements should be and who approves them and who decides what makes a good parent… And how do you keep people from having children without licenses… It ends up being scary either way.
Millions of children born disadvantaged, crippled in childhood, destroyed in adolescence. So people can have sex as much as they want without getting pregnant. Law enforcement and child-protection services are of course there to deal with abuse.
This sounds at first like insurmountable hurdles until you remember that they already exist and are already enforced. Instead, the question is whether the state should step in enforce such an ideal.
Although such a reaction may be understandable, there are fair reasons for at least raising the matter. People already accept the role of the state in deciding who does and does not deserve to be a parent when it comes to custody cases, foster care, and adoption.
Why, or why not? Forced abortion by the state would be the solution for most cases of unlicensed pregnancies. I also understand that your child is your child and you have to learn from your mistakes, but could that one mistake potentially kill or harm your child?
Incentivizing Behavior Parents want to encourage good behavior, and some may turn to incentives to keep their kids on track. You are never fully prepared to have children. We must keep in mind that there is a lot at stake for the children themselves. Having children is a blessing.
This is an example of how humanity reacts to a drastic change in society. I understand we are not a communist country and we do not want to be and everyone believes that human rights say everyone is entitled to have a family, but at what price. What if someone became pregnant and did not qualify for a license?
That would be like forcing people to have a license in order to breathe or walk — being a parent is a right rather than a privilege such as driving. Many, if not, most people are poorly prepared to parent.
Iran has more than halved its fertility rate in a decade. Children must not be sacrificed to the ideology, or idolatry, of population control.The last century has witnessed some of the most divisive and confrontational debates in human history--and many of these have focused on the institution of the family.
Now, two generations after the contraceptive revolution, the very right of parents to bear and raise children is under renewed attack. The implications of this debate will range far beyond. Pro parenting classes. When it comes to the topic of requiring moms and dads to take parenting classes and earn a license, most mamas are on board.
People should not be required to obtain a parenting license in order to have a child. It obviously violates freedom of people.
It is a bad idea because people should have the right to have babies and raise them. Obtaining a license would mean nothing and it would destroy the values and tradition of families.
So the act of procreation should go alongside those parents that wish to adopt or foster. The idea of the License is two-fold, The parent understands the responsibility of caring for a child and raising it to moral and socially appropriate standards, This second part being little different where more intense studies would take place.
However, by implementing a parenting license procedure we could do our best to make sure that no child is left unwanted, neglected or abused. “Utilitarianism argues that, given a set of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice.
A Non-Ethical Argument Against Parental Licensing Bruno Puši ć Abstract: LaFollette proposed that the best way to protect children from abuse and neglect caused by their parents would be to implement parental licenses to prospective parents.Download